Conference
This week's the annual ESPMH conference. This time in Debrecen, Hungary. I am one of the keynote speakers. This is the abstract of my lecture:
Click here for the full programme.
Title: How to get plump, or why do we choose what we choose?
Abstract
Back in
the late 1800s advertisements were made for a dietary supplement called Fat-ten-U
food, which guaranteed to “make the thin plump and rosy with honest fleshiness
of form”. By the beginning of the 21st century, an international
company called Prescan illustrates its website with witnesses from celebrities
to seduce us for a total body scan which “allows you to gain insight into your
health. During this examination the vital organs and blood vessels are
examined. In order to obtain the best possible picture of your body, we include
the Preventive Cardio Package with our Total Body Scan.”
In
between these two remarkable ads, the health discourse has changed
dramatically. Fitness and no longer fatness is the objective and the pressure
to live our lives along certain patterns and paths is unmistakably high. The
interesting thing is, there is no Uncle Sam pointing his finger at us, and yet,
in one way or another, we agree there is something wrong with us if we don’t
care for our health and body or we plead guilty if we don’t do any kind of
physical activity.
With
concepts like ‘governmentality’, ‘pastoral power’ or ‘population’, in his later
lectures on biopolitics, Michel Foucault attempted to conceive the question how
the care for public health became indeed a central task and for politics and
for all of us. Health is not only on the political agenda of many governments
(governmentality), it’s presence runs as an bioimperative through the whole of
society. It appeals to all of us (a totalizing technique) and to each one of us
(individualized). There is obviously something wrong with us (pastoral power)
if we don’t obey the imperative.
I apply
his analysis to the contemporary discourse on health promotion, the growing
interest of the government and insurance companies in our daily activities and
their attempt to interfere in it. Analysing the case of obesity, I will explore
how the discourse on patient empowerment is actually the ethico-medical way
through which people are governed. Far from a neutral plead, patient
empowerment puts the individual responsibility for our health right at the
centre of today’s medical discourse. Being unhealthy has become the synonym for
not having done enough.
It is
therefore no coincidence that today, public health, especially in
industrialised countries, has also become a question of having no longer access
to the health insurance due to ‘bad behaviour’, of being excluded from health
facilities, of food industry trying to get a grip on our food habits and tastes
with food supplements, etcetera. What we are dealing with today – public health
as an explicit task of contemporary politics – not only can be understood as
the culmination of an ongoing process of government of our daily life out of a
medical perspective; it is also an implicit political evolution which needs to
be made explicit, in order to understand the biopolitical ideology behind it.
Keywords: governmentality; Michel Foucault; health; fitness;
lifestyle
Click here for the full programme.
Comments
Post a Comment